This article examines some of the ways in which the states have contributed to important developments in the antitrust laws, both historically and in the present. Although they are resource constrained, the states have made a significant impact on the overall direction of the antitrust laws, by bringing a consumer-centric analysis to anticompetitive conduct and legislation. While the states often work cooperatively with the federal enforcers, there are many examples throughout history, and recently, where states have acted independent of the federal agencies. The article concludes that concurrent jurisdiction of the antitrust laws is beneficial and produces the best outcomes for consumers.
Featured News
Judge Pushes Elite College Financial Aid Antitrust Trial Toward Thanksgiving Finish
Jul 23, 2026 by
CPI
Altria, Juul Ask Appeals Court to Reverse Antitrust Class Certification
Jul 23, 2026 by
CPI
Japan Expands Antitrust Watchdog’s Role With New Bureau for Big Tech Oversight
Jul 23, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ Introduces Faster Merger Review Process With Targeted Antitrust Requests
Jul 23, 2026 by
CPI
EU Hits Google With $1 Billion Fine in First Digital Markets Act Penalty
Jul 23, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Compliance
Jul 20, 2026 by
CPI
Your Antitrust Compliance Program: A Strong Voice in Your Defense
Jul 20, 2026 by
Joe Murphy
Antitrust Compliance for the AI Pricing Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Alejandra Uria & Andre Geverola
Race to Report: Antitrust Leniency in the Whistleblower Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Brian R. Faerstein & Nicole H. Sprinzen
Antitrust-By-Design: Competition Compliance in Digital Markets
Jul 20, 2026 by
Marcos Drummond Malvar, Gabriela Costa Carvalho Forsman & Luciana Mendes