A PYMNTS Company

Comcast Advertising Monopoly Claims Revived

 |  February 24, 2020

Comcast must face revived claims it used its control over a regional advertising clearinghouse to monopolize “representation services” that coordinate TV ad placements in Chicago, Detroit, and Hartford,the Seventh Circuit ruled Monday.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    According to Bloomberg,the antitrust lawsuit accuses Comcast of leveraging its “interconnect”—the centralized advertising marketplace—to force rival telecoms to boycott the ad coordination services offered by Viamedia, its sole competitor in that arena.

    A Chicago federal judge dismissed the case in 2018, but the U.S. Court of Appeals revived it, saying the allegations of a “Hobson’s choice,” if true, demonstrate Comcast’s power to “damage competition beyond the relatively narrow markets” that are directly at issue.

    “This is not a case” of anti-monopoly laws “being misused to protect weaker competitors rather than competition more generally,” Judge David Hamilton wrote, sending the case back to Chicago federal court.