Mexico’s Supreme Court of Justice (SCJN) has announced that it will soon resolve one of the most controversial issues raised by the 2013 reform to telecommunications – the ’Zero Rate’, established by art. 131 of the Federal Law of Telecommunications and Broadcasting. This rule establishes that the economic agents designated as preponderant (in this case Carlos Slim’s América Móvil), will not be allowed to charge their competitors for calls terminating in their network.
Should this article be declared unconstitutional, the SCJN would have to give the sector regulator, the Federal Telecommunications Institute (IFT) the power to regulate these rates directly.
The possible resolution has caused varied reactions among América Móvil’s competitors, warning of possible adverse effects; “It has been proven over time that the most rapid and efficient way to bring more advanced networks to a country’s consumers and businesses is through free and open markets, private investment and growth-oriented policies,” said AT&T. “The effective and lasting implementation of these reforms will generate greater investment, which will benefit consumers and businesses, as well as a healthier environment for economic growth.”
Meanwhile, 3rd place Telefónica says that “the business model of our competitors has been built on the permanence of the existing legal framework, so that its disappearance would have serious consequences on the sustainability and composition of the sector.”
Featured News
The Hidden Security Risk Inside Your Company’s AI Tools
Mar 13, 2026 by
CPI
EU’s Largest Economies Push to Reduce Reliance on Foreign Payment Systems
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Warren Presses Amazon for Answers on Pricing Practices for Government Buyers
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Chief Raises Concerns Over Big Tech Control of AI
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Burson Adds Senior Advisor to Strengthen Competition Team
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece