A PYMNTS Company

Competition: A Workhorse, a Sacred Cow or a Lame Duck?

By  |  September 14, 2016

Posted by Social Science Research Network

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Competition: A Workhorse, a Sacred Cow or a Lame Duck?

    Adriaan Ten Kate Sr. (Independent)

    Abstract:      Competition is generally believed to greatly contribute to social welfare and economic progress, and that is the raison d’être of competition policy. In this essay I argue that such expectations are vastly overblown, that competition brings about the envisaged benefits only under specific conditions that are seldom met in the real world. Where competition does work is in research and development, but there traditional competition analysis has little to say due to the unpredictability and the shock-wise nature of innovation. My conclusion is that where competition policy has the rudder of competition analysis, the ship doesn’t move and where the ship moves, competition policy is rudderless.