A PYMNTS Company

The Proposed Damages Legislation: Don’t Believe the Critics

 |  February 6, 2014

Posted by Social Science Research Network

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The Proposed Damages Legislation: Don’t Believe the Critics – Robert H. Lande (University of Baltimore – School of Law)

    ABSTRACT: The European Commission’s proposed Directive concerning private enforcement of Competition Law certainly would be beneficial for victims of anticompetitive conduct because it would allow some victims to obtain a certain degree of compensation. It does not, however, go nearly far enough. Because it does not allow opt-out class action or contingent fee cases it will continue to leave most victims uncompensated.

    Some critics claim the proposed Directive will move Europe closer towards a US-style of private antitrust enforcement that they characterize in almost apocalyptic terms. Nevertheless, anyone interested in learning lessons from the US experience should take note that these critics have never offered reliable proof of its alleged defects. This short article shows that private enforcement in the United States has in fact been beneficial in many ways.