A PYMNTS Company

Some claims of nine-year Comcast class action in Philadelphia headed to trial

By  |  April 13, 2012

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    On Thursday, April 12, U.S. District Judge John R. Padova Jr. ruled on what claims could go forward on a nine-year class action lawsuit against Comcast. Judge Padova allowed the section 1 rule of reason to proceed to trial, on the issue of whether Comcast engaged in a horizontal allocation of markets in Philadelphia by creating a cable cluster through acquiring competitors and swapping cable assets. Section 2 claims can, in part, also go to trial, when they relate to Comcast’s discounts offered to potential RCN customers.

    Judge Padova granted Comcast’s motion for summary judgment on parts of two counts: (1) the section 1 claim of a per se violation, and (2) section 2 claims, insofar as they contend that clustering and blocking RCN access to contractors constituted acts of monopolization. The per se claim was rejected because Comcast successfully showed that the cluster created pro-competitive efficiences that increased consumer welfare.

    Full content: Philadelphia Business Journal

     

    Related content: The Brief Life of the Section 2 Report and the Uncertain Future of Bundled Discounts (Daniel Crane, University of Michigan Law School)