On Thursday, April 12, U.S. District Judge John R. Padova Jr. ruled on what claims could go forward on a nine-year class action lawsuit against Comcast. Judge Padova allowed the section 1 rule of reason to proceed to trial, on the issue of whether Comcast engaged in a horizontal allocation of markets in Philadelphia by creating a cable cluster through acquiring competitors and swapping cable assets. Section 2 claims can, in part, also go to trial, when they relate to Comcast’s discounts offered to potential RCN customers.
Judge Padova granted Comcast’s motion for summary judgment on parts of two counts: (1) the section 1 claim of a per se violation, and (2) section 2 claims, insofar as they contend that clustering and blocking RCN access to contractors constituted acts of monopolization. The per se claim was rejected because Comcast successfully showed that the cluster created pro-competitive efficiences that increased consumer welfare.
Full content: Philadelphia Business Journal
Related content: The Brief Life of the Section 2 Report and the Uncertain Future of Bundled Discounts (Daniel Crane, University of Michigan Law School)
Featured News
ConocoPhillips Acquires Marathon Oil for $22.5 Billion in Major Energy Sector Consolidation
May 29, 2024 by
CPI
Judge Denies Amazon’s Bid to Dismiss FTC Lawsuit Over Prime Membership Practices
May 29, 2024 by
CPI
Germany and France Advocate for Major EU Competition Reform
May 29, 2024 by
CPI
Equifax Accused of Monopolizing Employment Verification Market in New Suit
May 29, 2024 by
CPI
Car Battery Makers to Challenge EU Cartel Charges in Brussels
May 29, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Merger Guidelines Retrospective
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Mergers of Complements
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Personality Traits, Private Equity, and Merger Analysis
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
The 2023 Merger Guidelines: Lessons in the Importance of Incipiency, Modern Economics, and Monopsony
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
The 2023 Merger Guidelines: Sharpening Merger Analysis
May 21, 2024 by
CPI