A PYMNTS Company

Judge refuses to dismiss collusion claims against Citigroup and Discover for mandatory arbitration clause

By  |  February 9, 2012

U.S. District Judge William Pauley refused to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims of collusion by Citigroup and Discover over arbitration clauses. The lawsuit alleges that credit card holders were forced to agree to mandatory arbitration clauses, and if consumers refused, Citigroup and Discover did not issue them cards. Judge Pauley noted the defendants’ adoption of an arbitration clause that was similar to competitors’, as well as their attendance at meetings to discuss arbitration between 1999 and 2003.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Other card issuer defendants, including Bank of America, Capital One, and JP Morgan Chase, have since settled.

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    Add as Preferred Source

    Source: Reuters

     

    Related content: Anticompetitive Regulation in the Payment Card Industry (Ronald Mann, Columbia Law School)