
By:Florian Ederer & Bruno Pellegrino (CLS Blue Sky Blog)
Incumbent acquisitions have increased lately, as they allow larger companies to acquire new assets, from technology to talented employees and advisors. Startups, on their part, gain wider access to resources, a wider customer base, and decidedly more stability. This was the case with the notable acquisition of Whatsapp by internet giant Facebook in 2014, which came in at a headline-stealing $19 billion, despite Whatsapp’s relatively small size (at only 55 employees) and revenue. However, its immense rise in popularity at over 450 million users made Facebook see the growth potential in the company, deciding to acquire it in order to boost their own messaging service, Facebook Messenger.
Likewise, we can look at Amazon’s purchase of Twitch for $970 million, also in 2014. The live-streaming platform used most prominently by video game streamers was an example of a large and highly committed user base, which Amazon could use to expand its own video streaming offering. The platform has continued to grow since Amazon snapped it up, becoming a major name in the video game industry with over 30 million active users per month and an entire streaming industry developing around it.
These and other examples have been the subject of scrutiny and debate for some time now. Some commentators argue that these purchases help entrench dominant firms, or even kill innovation. Instead of allowing for new synergies, these “killer acquisitions”, as they are sometimes called, may protect incumbent firms by preventing newcomers from fully challenging their existing business models.
In this article, authors Florian Ederer and Bruno Pellegrino present their new paper, where they shed new light on this debate by documenting the way venture capital exit strategies have changed, going from IPOs to acquisitions by incumbents. They also show show evidence of how this might have affected competition in the United States…
Featured News
Dollar Tree to Sell Family Dollar for $1 Billion, Ending Struggling Merger
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
Meta Platforms Defends Use of Authors’ Works in AI Training in US Court
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
EU Pressed Meta to Address Antitrust Concerns Over Facebook Marketplace
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
UBS, Nomura, and UniCredit Fail to Overturn EU Antitrust Fines in Bond Trading Cartel Case
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
Coca-Cola Among Firms Targeted in EU Antitrust Raids
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mobile Ecosystems
Mar 24, 2025 by
CPI
Mobile Ecosystems: An Intellectual Entelechy but A Necessary Model
Mar 24, 2025 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
Creating Contestability and Fairness in Mobile Ecosystems: The Contribution of the DMA
Mar 24, 2025 by
Damien Geradin & Daniel Mandrescu
Digital Ecosystems and the Not (Yet) As Efficient Competitor Principle
Mar 24, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Assessing the Competition Law Scrutiny of Smart Wearables and Mobile AR/VR Devices
Mar 24, 2025 by
Kayvan Hazemi-Jebelli