Bill Allan, Apr 01, 2006
DG Competition’s discussion paper appears to signal a departure from the form-based approach articulated most strongly in Michelin II. However, its full significance is limited by the enunciation of a precautionary principle under which abuse is framed to capture any conduct likely to limit entry or expansion and justification is limited to the narrowest plausible extent. While that approach reflects a concern to prevent the erection of artificial entry barriers, it results in rules that undervalue existing competition. That risk is compounded by a narrow approach to market definition and dominance. These problems will only be avoided if the European Commission fully embraces a standard based on a determination that the disputed conduct substantially lessens effective competition in a way that can effectively be remedied by intervention under Article 82 of the EC Treaty.
Featured News
Antitrust Suit Against Apple, Visa, and Mastercard Dismissed by Federal Judge
Jul 10, 2025 by
CPI
Google’s Antitrust Woes Mount as Turkey Levels Another Fine
Jul 10, 2025 by
CPI
Australian Competition Commission Approves Lactalis Bid for Fonterra Brands
Jul 10, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Administration Sues California Over Egg Laws, Citing Nationwide Price Hikes
Jul 10, 2025 by
CPI
Blackstone Raises Warehouse REIT Bid to £489M, Topping Rival
Jul 10, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – eDiscovery & Antitrust
Jun 30, 2025 by
CPI
Off-Channel and Ephemeral Messaging in Antitrust Investigations: Legal Risks, Regulatory Focus, and Ediscovery Challenges
Jun 30, 2025 by
Daniel Rupprecht & Tristan Jenkinson
Encrypted Messaging in the Crosshairs: Compliance, Legal Risks, and Global Perspectives
Jun 30, 2025 by
Corey Bieber & Guillermo Christensen
Ephemeral and Encrypted Messaging: DOJ Expectations, Compliance Risks, and Best Practices
Jun 30, 2025 by
Megan Gerking, Joe Folio, Haydn Forrest & Adrienne Irmer
Antitrust Litigation in the Age of GenAI
Jun 30, 2025 by
Robin Perkins & Tom Gricks