A PYMNTS Company

Argentina’s Antitrust Commission Clears Loma Negra, Boosting Market Sentiment

By  |  October 30, 2024

Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima, Argentina’s prominent cement producer, has been exonerated by the Argentine Antitrust Commission from allegations of anti-competitive practices. According to Yahoo, this outcome follows a detailed investigation, ultimately concluding with a binding decision that absolves the company of any wrongdoing.

This favorable ruling is anticipated to bolster Loma Negra’s standing among investors, many of whom had been closely monitoring the investigation’s impact on the company’s reputation and market stability. Per Yahoo, the Argentine Antitrust Commission’s thorough examination aimed to address concerns around competitive practices within Argentina’s cement industry, which has faced scrutiny over market control and pricing practices. Loma Negra’s clearance from these allegations may restore confidence and mitigate any lingering investor concerns regarding the company’s regulatory compliance and ethical standards.

The resolution comes at a time when companies in heavily regulated sectors like construction materials are under increased pressure to maintain transparency and fair market practices. For Loma Negra, this decision not only solidifies its position in Argentina’s cement industry but could also positively affect the broader perception of its corporate governance practices.

As a binding decision, this ruling eliminates any potential for further legal action on these matters, providing a significant relief to stakeholders and potentially stabilizing LOMA’s stock performance. With regulatory concerns now addressed, the company is positioned to focus on its core business objectives, contributing to Argentina’s growing infrastructure needs.

Source: Yahoo

South Dakota Reaches Settlement With NCAA Ahead of Antitrust Payout Approval South Dakota Reaches Settlement With NCAA Ahead of Antitrust Payout Approval

South Dakota Reaches Settlement With NCAA Ahead of Antitrust Payout Approval

By  |  April 23, 2025

South Dakota and the NCAA have resolved their legal dispute just days before a critical federal court ruling on the NCAA’s proposed $2.8 billion antitrust settlement, a move that could have broad implications for collegiate athletics across the country.

The settlement, confirmed by South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley, marks the conclusion of a months-long legal battle over how the financial burden of the House, Carter, and Hubbard antitrust cases would be distributed among NCAA Division I institutions. According to Sportico, the NCAA has now agreed to reduce the financial hit to all D-I programs, including those not part of the Power Four conferences, by 33%.

South Dakota’s lawsuit, filed in September on behalf of the University of South Dakota (USD) and South Dakota State University (SDSU), challenged the NCAA’s plan to fund the landmark settlement by decreasing future revenue distributions to its members. The state contended that smaller programs like USD and SDSU would be disproportionately impacted, forfeiting a combined $8 million over the next decade—an amount South Dakota argued bore no relation to the NIL-related gains or legal risks tied to their athletes.

Per Sportico, the NCAA’s updated approach includes a $55 million contribution from a surplus in its national office budget, funds made available after exceeding fiscal targets. The association also reiterated its commitment to hosting championship events in South Dakota and preserving revenues tied to the newly formed Division I women’s basketball fund.

Related: South Dakota’s Lawsuit Against NCAA to Proceed in State Court

Previously, South Dakota had pursued a preliminary injunction to halt the NCAA from reducing distributions, with a hearing set for last Thursday. That proceeding was ultimately canceled after both sides reached a deal.

The dispute initially gained traction after a similar legal concern raised by Houston Christian University (HCU) failed in federal court last summer. Learning from that attempt, South Dakota pursued the matter in its state court, arguing the issue was contractual in nature and not subject to federal oversight. A federal judge agreed last month, remanding the case back to state jurisdiction.

In announcing the resolution, Jackley emphasized the dual benefits of the agreement: a tangible financial concession from the NCAA and the opportunity for South Dakota to collaborate with the association on future financial policies. “This settlement is a win for our universities and ensures that our athletes and programs are not unfairly penalized,” Jackley said in a public statement.

The NCAA, in its own release, maintained that South Dakota’s claims lacked legal merit, noting that internal financial decisions by membership organizations are typically insulated from court challenges. It further argued that the potential budget shortfalls cited by USD and SDSU—less than 5% of their respective athletic budgets—did not meet the standard for court-ordered intervention.

Source: Sportico