Engineering firm Bradken Ltd. has vowed to fight a federal court’s decision charging the company of bid-rigging and ordering $22.4 million in fines as shares for the Australian company dropped nearly 5 percent. It was a considered a landmark case as the first instance of expanding Australia’s antirust law to cover bid-rigging, first introduced in 2010. Bradken was accused of violating law in both its acquisition and sale of Norcast Wear Solutions, a Canadian company, in just one day. Pala Investments, based in Switzerland, first initiated the lawsuit against Bradken.
Featured News
Canada Intensifies Scrutiny of AI Risks in Banking Sector
Jul 13, 2026 by
CPI
Second Circuit Upholds Injunction Against Nielsen in Radio Ratings Antitrust Fight
Jul 13, 2026 by
CPI
TransDigm Abandons $960M Stellant Systems Acquisition After US Antitrust Pushback
Jul 13, 2026 by
CPI
Administration Expands Effort to Keep AI-Driven Electricity Costs Off Consumer Bills
Jul 13, 2026 by
CPI
Mexican Lawmakers Move to Challenge Sony Over Potential PlayStation Store Monopoly
Jul 13, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Due Process
Jul 7, 2026 by
CPI
The Hart‑Scott‑Rodino Act at Fifty: Procedure, Thresholds, Serial Acquisitions, and Industry Dynamics
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ginger Zhe Jin, Mario Leccese, Daniel Sokol, Liad Wagman & Mengyi Zhong
Due Process In Competition Cases: Reflections As Of 2026
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ian Forrester & Pablo Trevisan
When Referees Become Reformers: Due Process and Constitutional Considerations in Competition Market Investigations
Jul 7, 2026 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Procedural Fairness in Antitrust Enforcement: A Comparative Analysis
Jul 7, 2026 by
J. Mark Gidley & Daniel Sokol