Engineering firm Bradken Ltd. has vowed to fight a federal court’s decision charging the company of bid-rigging and ordering $22.4 million in fines as shares for the Australian company dropped nearly 5 percent. It was a considered a landmark case as the first instance of expanding Australia’s antirust law to cover bid-rigging, first introduced in 2010. Bradken was accused of violating law in both its acquisition and sale of Norcast Wear Solutions, a Canadian company, in just one day. Pala Investments, based in Switzerland, first initiated the lawsuit against Bradken.
Full Content: Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
UK Competition Watchdog to Investigate Carlsberg’s £3.3bn Takeover of Britvic
Sep 11, 2024 by
CPI
News Corp Faced Millions in Losses by Moving Away from Google Ads, Ex-Executive Testifies
Sep 10, 2024 by
CPI
EU Faces Critical Innovation Gap, Draghi Report Urges Antitrust Reforms
Sep 10, 2024 by
CPI
Womble Bond Dickinson and Lewis Roca to Merge, Forming 1,300-Lawyer Firm
Sep 10, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Fidelity and Schwab
Sep 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI