Engineering firm Bradken Ltd. has vowed to fight a federal court’s decision charging the company of bid-rigging and ordering $22.4 million in fines as shares for the Australian company dropped nearly 5 percent. It was a considered a landmark case as the first instance of expanding Australia’s antirust law to cover bid-rigging, first introduced in 2010. Bradken was accused of violating law in both its acquisition and sale of Norcast Wear Solutions, a Canadian company, in just one day. Pala Investments, based in Switzerland, first initiated the lawsuit against Bradken.
Featured News
Golden Globes Lawsuit Puts Media Acquisitions and Antitrust Concerns in the Spotlight
Jul 28, 2026 by
CPI
UK Lawsuit Against xAI Highlights Growing Pressure Over AI-Generated Deepfakes
Jul 28, 2026 by
CPI
Google Faces New Wave of Private Antitrust Claims After EU Digital Markets Act Fine
Jul 28, 2026 by
CPI
Shein Faces Fresh FTC Review as US Regulators Tighten Oversight of E-Commerce
Jul 28, 2026 by
CPI
German Cartel Office Fines Maxxis, Two Tire Distributors Over Illegal Pricing Practices
Jul 28, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Compliance
Jul 20, 2026 by
CPI
Your Antitrust Compliance Program: A Strong Voice in Your Defense
Jul 20, 2026 by
Joe Murphy
Antitrust Compliance for the AI Pricing Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Alejandra Uria & Andre Geverola
Race to Report: Antitrust Leniency in the Whistleblower Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Brian R. Faerstein & Nicole H. Sprinzen
Antitrust-By-Design: Competition Compliance in Digital Markets
Jul 20, 2026 by
Marcos Drummond Malvar, Gabriela Costa Carvalho Forsman & Luciana Mendes