As concern mounts over spikes in fees charged to credit card users, reports say a mix of low competition and overlapping regulatory action are contributing factors to the problem.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has reportedly blamed the problem of overcharged card transactions on the fact that two regulators are responsible for monitoring the problem, leading to cases falling through the cracks. In a filing to the Financial System Inquiry, the Commission reportedly wrote that “a co-regulatory approach to limit an activity appears to have failed because the limitation imposed by payment schemes is not sufficient clear, and is not being enforced by a regulator with sufficient powers and resources to carry out the enforcement,” adding that the body “does not have any direct power to restrict the amount of a surcharge to the reasonable costs incurred by a merchant in accepting a card.”
The ASIC, along with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commissioner, are both given powers to restrict such surcharges, but those powers carry exceptions in certain cases. Now, say reports, merchants are calling upon a single regulator to have the power to monitor the fees.
The Reserve Bank of Australia amended guidelines last year to allow for such a regulator, say reports, but card companies and banks must enforce those rules.
Top card companies Visa and MasterCard, meanwhile, blame such overcharges on a lack of competition in certain industries, like airlines and utilities.
Full Content: Brisbane Times
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
University of Kentucky Eyes Structural Shift Amid Antitrust Pressures
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Opt-Out Flops Out At WIPO Meeting on AI and IP
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Belgian Watchdog Fines Pharma Giants Over Anti-Competitive Practices in Pharmacies
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
X Sues Minnesota Over Law Banning AI Deepfakes in Elections
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Twelve States Sue Trump Over Tariff Policy, Citing Overreach of Executive Power
Apr 24, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece