San Francisco Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo denied Sutter Health’s motion to delay finalizing its US$575 million settlement with the state of California in a case that alleged anti-competitive practices, reported The Sacramento Bee.
The benefits arm of the United Food & Commercial Workers began pursuing this civil lawsuit in 2014, but four years later, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said that, because Sutter’s actions were driving up prices all around Northern California, he was filing a lawsuit that would consolidate the grocery worker’s lawsuit.
Becerra expressed satisfaction that the judge ruled in favor of the California Department of Justice’s motion to deny any delays: “Sutter’s practices harmed California’s healthcare market by charging higher prices unrelated to quality or cost of care. They did that long before the COVID-19 pandemic. There is no period of time that medical providers, like Sutter, should be able to carry out such destructive market practice.”
Sutter had asserted in its motion that the company needed time to assess and make changes to its businesses following financial losses incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. The company stated it spent millions adding surge capacity even as hospital admissions drastically dropped.
“Our entire integrated network acted quickly to adapt our ‘normal’ operations and prepare and manage through patient surges in response to this pandemic,” company officials said in a statement sent to The Bee Friday, July 10. “Over the last few weeks, like the rest of the state, we’ve seen an uptick in cases of COVID-19, including hospitalizations that have pushed us to our highest surge levels. This surge requires ongoing emergency response efforts across our integrated network as we continue to provide high quality care during these uncertain times.”
However, researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, released on Thursday an analysis of hospital finances that showed that Sutter had enough securities and cash on hand to weather 7,109 days of business. The researchers noted that, in 2015, the health care consultant Optum found that US hospitals had a median of 27 days of cash on hand from short-term sources.
Full Content: The Sacramento Bee
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Turkey Ends Meta Investigation Over Threads and Instagram
Dec 8, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court to Hear CCI Petition on Amazon, Flipkart Antitrust Cases
Dec 8, 2024 by
CPI
Senators Urge Antitrust Probe Into FanDuel and DraftKings
Dec 8, 2024 by
CPI
Novo Holdings Secures EU Approval for $16.5 Billion Catalent Acquisition
Dec 8, 2024 by
CPI
US Appeals Court Upholds TikTok Divestment Law, Paving Way for Potential Ban
Dec 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead