Michael Salinger, Apr 01, 2010
In both consumer protection and antitrust, the use of standard economic analysis has generally been to limit the scope of government intervention. The interest in behavioral economics (and some of the resistance to it) stems from the belief that it justifies intervention that conventional economic analysis suggests is unwarranted. Proponents see behavioral economics as the antidote to the Chicago School poison. Opponents see it as a mutated bacterium, resistant to the economic medicine that has led to improved policy. In this article, I will provide some background on behavioral economics and assess what insights it provides for consumer protection and antitrust policy.
Featured News
Obama Calls on Democrats to Confront Risks From Rapid AI Growth
Sep 13, 2026 by
CPI
Cravath Lands Six Weil Partners in High-Profile M&A Team Hire
Sep 13, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount, State AGs Set October Settlement Talks in Antitrust Fight
Sep 13, 2026 by
CPI
Broadcom’s VMware Licensing Changes Draw Deeper EU Antitrust Scrutiny
Sep 13, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Fines Hit Record as Regulator Steps Up Chaebol Scrutiny
Sep 13, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – State Attorneys General
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
CPI Talks… with Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General of Tennessee
Aug 27, 2026 by
Jonathan Skrmetti
What the Live Nation Jury Instructions Tell Us About California’s Unfair Competition Law
Aug 27, 2026 by
Henry Hauser, Brent Nakamura, Ashley Kaplan, Brian Wang & Cari Jeffries
From Backroom Deals to Public Scrutiny: The Tunney Act’s Past, Present, and Future
Aug 27, 2026 by
Christina M. Black & Ashley A. Locke
Understanding the Fragility of Economic Concentration Through the Principles of Ecology
Aug 27, 2026 by
Alexandra Spring