Michael Salinger, Apr 01, 2010
In both consumer protection and antitrust, the use of standard economic analysis has generally been to limit the scope of government intervention. The interest in behavioral economics (and some of the resistance to it) stems from the belief that it justifies intervention that conventional economic analysis suggests is unwarranted. Proponents see behavioral economics as the antidote to the Chicago School poison. Opponents see it as a mutated bacterium, resistant to the economic medicine that has led to improved policy. In this article, I will provide some background on behavioral economics and assess what insights it provides for consumer protection and antitrust policy.
Featured News
Mexico Clears Paramount-Warner Bros. Deal as US Antitrust Fight Persists
Aug 16, 2026 by
CPI
Missouri Opens Fertilizer Antitrust Probe as Price-Fixing Scrutiny Widens
Aug 16, 2026 by
CPI
Exxon Defeats Antitrust Claim in Louisiana Pipeline Dispute
Aug 16, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Floats CNN Sale as California Antitrust Fight Threatens Warner Bros Deal
Aug 16, 2026 by
CPI
FTC Probes Epic Systems Over Potential Antitrust Violations
Aug 16, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Compliance
Jul 20, 2026 by
CPI
Your Antitrust Compliance Program: A Strong Voice in Your Defense
Jul 20, 2026 by
Joe Murphy
Antitrust Compliance for the AI Pricing Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Alejandra Uria & Andre Geverola
Race to Report: Antitrust Leniency in the Whistleblower Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Brian R. Faerstein & Nicole H. Sprinzen
Antitrust-By-Design: Competition Compliance in Digital Markets
Jul 20, 2026 by
Marcos Drummond Malvar, Gabriela Costa Carvalho Forsman & Luciana Mendes