In a costly mistake for the firmer competition authority of Ottawa, Canada’s Competition Tribunal ended a high-profile case by ruling against the watchdog and in favor of the Toronto Real Estate Board. According to reports, it was a filing technicality that determined the case’s result, as a suit filed by the commission against the real estate board was filed under the wrong section of the Competition Act. Interim Commissioner of Competition John Pecman said his office is “disappointed” by the decision, which was made public by the tribunal this week. According to the ruling, the allegations of anticompetitive practices were filed under the 2012 Abuse of Dominance Guidelines; the tribunal noted that the proper filing would have fallen under Section 90 of the Act, which concerns behavior by trade associations. Pecman announced that his office will review their next options.
Featured News
Dana, Eaton Strike Auto Parts Deal Worth More Than $10 Billion
Jun 11, 2026 by
CPI
CFTC Proposes New Rules For What’s Allowed on Prediction Markets
Jun 11, 2026 by
CPI
Connecticut vs. California’s Data Broker Laws: New Compliance Challenges
Jun 11, 2026 by
CPI
Spain’s CNMC Clears Eight Business Concentration Transactions in May
Jun 11, 2026 by
CPI
Ryanair Faces UK Competition Probe Over Family Seating Charges
Jun 11, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – (Geo)Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
CPI
Competition Policy in Turbulent Geopolitical Times
May 28, 2026 by
Christophe Carugati & Annabelle Gawer
The New Political Determinants of U.S. Antitrust Policy
May 28, 2026 by
Aziz Z. Huq
The Geopolitical Rewiring of Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
Hayane C. Dahmen
Three Strikes Against Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
Nolan McCarty & Sepehr Shahshahani