In a costly mistake for the firmer competition authority of Ottawa, Canada’s Competition Tribunal ended a high-profile case by ruling against the watchdog and in favor of the Toronto Real Estate Board. According to reports, it was a filing technicality that determined the case’s result, as a suit filed by the commission against the real estate board was filed under the wrong section of the Competition Act. Interim Commissioner of Competition John Pecman said his office is “disappointed” by the decision, which was made public by the tribunal this week. According to the ruling, the allegations of anticompetitive practices were filed under the 2012 Abuse of Dominance Guidelines; the tribunal noted that the proper filing would have fallen under Section 90 of the Act, which concerns behavior by trade associations. Pecman announced that his office will review their next options.
Featured News
NBA Teams Up With US Regulator on Prediction Markets
Oct 27, 2026 by
CPI
Intesa Wins ECB Approval for $36 Billion Monte dei Paschi Takeover
Oct 27, 2026 by
CPI
PayPal, Revolut Weigh In as UK Targets Apple’s Tap-to-Pay Rules
Oct 27, 2026 by
CPI
Heineken Ordered to Pay $124 Million in Greek Antitrust Case
Oct 27, 2026 by
CPI
FTC Raises Antitrust Concerns Over Cintas’ $5.5 Billion Deal
Oct 27, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Exclusive Dealing
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Exclusive Dealing Without Exclusivity: Screening Contracts, Loyalty Rebates, and the Limits of Antitrust Tests
Oct 25, 2026 by
David Martimort & Jérôme Pouyet
When Competition for Exclusivity Raises Prices: Rebates, Pricing Rules, and the Insulin Puzzle
Oct 25, 2026 by
Daniel P. O’Brien & Greg Shaffer
Why Leaving the Door Open Can Be (Much) Worse Than Closing It: Share-Based Requirements, Buyer-Specific Costs, and Foreclosure
Oct 25, 2026 by
Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI