Canada: California’s electricity crisis has British Columbia giant on defensive
A massive legal case concerning money made by British Columbia more than 10 years ago at the expense of California’s energy crisis has BC and an electricity giant on the defensive. A US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission judge ruled earlier this month that the state of California could potentially collect $1.6 billion from power companies – including BC Hydro’s subsidiary Powerex – as a result of energy price hikes between 2000 and 2001. Energy costs jumped up to 900 percent at the time, leading to price-fixing allegations and specifically accusing companies of selling BC Hydro’s energy when prices were high, then selling energy to Canada when prices dropped, according to the court ruling. British Columbia’s Energy Minister Rich Coleman has denied any wrongdoing and said BC will continue to fight the allegations. Powerex says it expects another five years of court fighting in a case that has already lasted 12.
Featured News
SEC Enforcement Chief Margaret Ryan Steps Down After Six Months
Mar 16, 2026 by
CPI
India’s CCI Prepares Action on Potential Anti-Competitive Conduct in AI Sector
Mar 16, 2026 by
CPI
Proposal Calls for Treating Digital Platform Design Standards Like Physical Infrastructure
Mar 16, 2026 by
CPI
Europe’s Cybersecurity Clock Is Ticking. Here’s What Companies Need to Know
Mar 16, 2026 by
CPI
European Publishers and Startups Call for Swift EU Decision in Google Case
Mar 16, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece