Canada: California’s electricity crisis has British Columbia giant on defensive
A massive legal case concerning money made by British Columbia more than 10 years ago at the expense of California’s energy crisis has BC and an electricity giant on the defensive. A US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission judge ruled earlier this month that the state of California could potentially collect $1.6 billion from power companies – including BC Hydro’s subsidiary Powerex – as a result of energy price hikes between 2000 and 2001. Energy costs jumped up to 900 percent at the time, leading to price-fixing allegations and specifically accusing companies of selling BC Hydro’s energy when prices were high, then selling energy to Canada when prices dropped, according to the court ruling. British Columbia’s Energy Minister Rich Coleman has denied any wrongdoing and said BC will continue to fight the allegations. Powerex says it expects another five years of court fighting in a case that has already lasted 12.
Featured News
Film Producers Raise Antitrust Concerns Over Paramount-Warner Deal
Jul 30, 2026 by
CPI
EU Signals ChatGPT, Roblox Could Face Expanded Digital Services Rules
Jul 30, 2026 by
CPI
OpenAI, Trump Administration Discuss Voluntary AI Safety Testing
Jul 30, 2026 by
CPI
SAP Says German Antitrust Authority Ends Preliminary Review Without Formal Case
Jul 30, 2026 by
CPI
Keystone Launches Washington Antitrust Practice With 2 Former DOJ Officials
Jul 30, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Compliance
Jul 20, 2026 by
CPI
Your Antitrust Compliance Program: A Strong Voice in Your Defense
Jul 20, 2026 by
Joe Murphy
Antitrust Compliance for the AI Pricing Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Alejandra Uria & Andre Geverola
Race to Report: Antitrust Leniency in the Whistleblower Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Brian R. Faerstein & Nicole H. Sprinzen
Antitrust-By-Design: Competition Compliance in Digital Markets
Jul 20, 2026 by
Marcos Drummond Malvar, Gabriela Costa Carvalho Forsman & Luciana Mendes