A PYMNTS Company

Canada: When engineering competition drops, collusion rises, says judge

By  |  September 4, 2013

A judge presiding over a corruption case regarding various engineering companies in Quebec said the lack of competitors in the industry lead to collusion.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Justice France Charbonneau heard testimony from engineers from the area’s business this week, outlining how the companies colluded to rig bids and win projects for Quebec City and Gatineau projects. The judge blamed such collusion on the lack of competition following this testimony.

    One such testimony claimed that just eight firms, a relatively low number of competitors, ran the engineering sector and broke the law to ensure steady profits following the establishment of Bill 106, designed to stop such corruption yet deemed as unfair by some in the market.

    Testimony also accused firms of fixing prices.

    Full Content: CTV News

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.