A judge presiding over a corruption case regarding various engineering companies in Quebec said the lack of competitors in the industry lead to collusion.
Justice France Charbonneau heard testimony from engineers from the area’s business this week, outlining how the companies colluded to rig bids and win projects for Quebec City and Gatineau projects. The judge blamed such collusion on the lack of competition following this testimony.
One such testimony claimed that just eight firms, a relatively low number of competitors, ran the engineering sector and broke the law to ensure steady profits following the establishment of Bill 106, designed to stop such corruption yet deemed as unfair by some in the market.
Testimony also accused firms of fixing prices.
Full Content: CTV News
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI