The Business Standard reports that there has been a recent influx of complaints lodged against real estate players at the Competition Commission of India. Complainants are encouraged by the DLF penalty handed down by the CCI. An official estimates that at least 200 letters have been received, but they mostly address delays in delivery and buyer-builder agreements. Thus six real estate cases in the past two months have been dismissed because they did not have dominant shares in the market. Sections 3 or 4 of the Competition Act are intended to address those anticompetitive actions and abuses by dominant players.
To remedy the complaints lodged against the industry, the National Real Estate Development Council plans to draft a national agreement to serve as a model buyer-builder agreement.
Full content: Business Standard
Related content: Competition Commission of India’s Trysts with Law and Policy: Enforcement One Year On (Pallavi Shroff & Harman Sandhu, Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A Shroff & Co)
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI