The Business Standard reports that there has been a recent influx of complaints lodged against real estate players at the Competition Commission of India. Complainants are encouraged by the DLF penalty handed down by the CCI. An official estimates that at least 200 letters have been received, but they mostly address delays in delivery and buyer-builder agreements. Thus six real estate cases in the past two months have been dismissed because they did not have dominant shares in the market. Sections 3 or 4 of the Competition Act are intended to address those anticompetitive actions and abuses by dominant players.
Featured News
Google Revamps Android App Store Rules, Cuts Fees Amid Global Antitrust Pressure
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
White House Reviews Tencent’s Gaming Stakes as Trump Prepares for China Visit
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
Charles River Associates Adds Senior Consultant to Antitrust Practice
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates Major Fertilizer Producers Over Possible Price Coordination
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
NY Bill Would Bar AI Chatbots From Providing ‘Substantive’ Medical or Legal Responses
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece