A new study found that, contradictory to previous beliefs, Chinese reverse mergers within the US are not more harmful than domestic companies.
The study, entitled ”Shell Games: Are Chinese revere merger firms inherently toxic?”, found no evidence that such mergers were harmful within the US despite recent scrutiny from regulators following scandals of China-based firms.
Recent scandals involved China MediaExprss and China Agritech and lead to suspensions in trading.
But the study, performed by Charles M.C. Lee of Stanford University, Kevin K. Li from the University of Toronto and Ran Zhang of Peking University, found no evidence to support the idea that Chinese reverse mergers were more “toxic” than their domestic counterparts.
The study looked at revere mergers within the US between 2001 and 2010, during which China-based firms represented 85 percent of such mergers.
Full Content: CNBC
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI