A new study found that, contradictory to previous beliefs, Chinese reverse mergers within the US are not more harmful than domestic companies.
The study, entitled ”Shell Games: Are Chinese revere merger firms inherently toxic?”, found no evidence that such mergers were harmful within the US despite recent scrutiny from regulators following scandals of China-based firms.
Recent scandals involved China MediaExprss and China Agritech and lead to suspensions in trading.
But the study, performed by Charles M.C. Lee of Stanford University, Kevin K. Li from the University of Toronto and Ran Zhang of Peking University, found no evidence to support the idea that Chinese reverse mergers were more “toxic” than their domestic counterparts.
The study looked at revere mergers within the US between 2001 and 2010, during which China-based firms represented 85 percent of such mergers.
Full Content: CNBC
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC Withdraws Case Against Microsoft-Activision Merger, Citing Public Interest
May 23, 2025 by
CPI
Charter to Acquire Cox Communications in $35 Billion Deal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Media Watchdog Over Alleged Collusion Against Musk’s X
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Drops Antitrust Case Accusing Pepsi of Squeezing Small Retailers
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Shein Warns of Higher Costs for French Shoppers Amid EU Fee Proposal
May 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros