The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) announced on Tuesday, April 7, that it could refer SIG’s disposal of its building solutions business to Kingspan for an in-depth investigation as it raises competition concerns in the supply of specialist insulation panels.
Building materials supplier SIG agreed last October to sell its building solutions segment to Kingspan for £37.5 million (US$46.3 million).
The competition watchdog noted that Kingspan is the leading provider in the UK of standard foam sandwich panels, commonly used as insulated cladding on commercial and industrial buildings such as large waste facilities. The company already owns a number of businesses that supply these products in the UK, including Joris Ide.
SIG’s building solutions business also sells a range of insulation and specialist construction products through a variety of businesses, the regulator stated.
“Kingspan and Building Solutions are two of only three key suppliers of standard foam sandwich panels in the UK and would only face serious competition from one other UK-based supplier – Tata Steel – after the deal,” the CMA stated. “Competition from suppliers of products imported from outside the UK and suppliers of other products sometimes used as insulated cladding is also very limited.”
As a result, the CMA’s Phase 1 investigation found that the deal could leave the merging companies’ customers, usually building contractors, with few alternative suppliers to choose from.
The CMA’s senior director, Colin Raftery, said, “Foam sandwich panels are widely used in non-residential buildings across the UK, such as supermarket distribution centres, hospitals and police stations. Sales of foam sandwich panels in the UK amounted to about £200 million last year, so they account for an important part of the construction costs faced by businesses and public bodies.
“Kingspan is by far the largest player in this market and this deal would involve it buying up one of its only two meaningful competitors. So, we’re concerned that the deal could damage competition, resulting in higher prices or lower quality products.”
Full Content: Gov UK
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Amex GBT Pushes Back Against DOJ Lawsuit Over CWT Acquisition
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Belgium Opens Antitrust Probe into AB InBev’s Market Practices
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Groups Sue CFPB Over New Rule on Digital Wallet Oversight
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Chief Ribera: Consumer Protections Remain Top Priority
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Mylan Agrees to $73.5 Million Settlement Over EpiPen Pricing Allegations
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand