The South African Constitutional Court (ConCourt) has denied the Competition Commission’s applications for leave to appeal the Yara and Loungefoam cases. The Commission sought to appeal earlier decisions of the Competition Appeal Court (CAC) that curtail the watchdog’s investigative powers.
In Yara, the CAC blocked the Commission from adding facts to its complaint referral to the Competition Tribunal that were uncovered during a later investigation. The ConCourt held that the Commission’s delay in making its application was excessive, with insufficient explanations to justify the delay.
In Loungefoam, ConCourt held that the Commission could not bypass the Supreme Court of Appeal by applying directly for leave to appeal with the ConCourt.
The Commission’s application to appeal Yara to the Supreme Court of Appeal is still pending.
Full content: Polity
Related content: Competition Law Develops in Southern Africa
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI