The Federal Court has found that Energy Watch had engaged in a misleading advertising campaign for its energy price comparison service. From January to September 2011, Energy Watch had run ads on television, radio, and print that claimed to compare the rates of all energy retailers in an area. In fact, the advertisements had merely compared the rates of one’s current energy retailer with Energy Watch’s preferred suppliers–those retailers with whom Energy Watch had commercial agreements. Moreover, Energy Watch misled customers on how much they would be saving by switching to those preferred suppliers. Each switch generated a commission for Energy Watch.
Featured News
Winston & Strawn and Taylor Wessing to Form Global Firm in Proposed 2026 Merger
Dec 15, 2025 by
CPI
Retailers Urge Judge to Block Visa, Mastercard Fee Settlement
Dec 15, 2025 by
CPI
House Passes INVEST Act, Sending Capital Access Overhaul to Senate
Dec 15, 2025 by
CPI
EU Trade Commissioner Warns Against Weakening Tech Rules Under US Pressure
Dec 15, 2025 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Chief Backs Stronger Rules for Digital Platforms
Dec 15, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Acqui-hiring
Dec 11, 2025 by
CPI
Anticompetitive Effects of Acquihires: Labor and Product Markets
Dec 11, 2025 by
Heski Bar-Isaac, Justin Johnson & Volker Nocke
Acquihires In the Technology Sector: Antitrust Scrutiny Through the Lens of Economics
Dec 11, 2025 by
Juliette Caminade, Rebecca Kirk Fair, Zsolt Udvari & Jeanne Vellard Smith
M&A in the AI Era: Considerations for Acquihiring
Dec 11, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre, Kenneth Schwartz, Christopher Barlow, Page Griffin, Michael Cardella, Stuart Levi, Taylor Votek, Benjamin Salzer, Lisa G. Liu & Liz Kraus
Lock Them Up, or Take No Prisoners? Merger Policy and Acquiring AI Talent: Human Rights and Other Inconvenient Facts
Dec 11, 2025 by
Simon R. Pritchard