Brussels Commercial Court overturned the decision regarding the first damages the European Commission (Ec) ever claimed. The EC fined five different elevator and escalator manufacturers in 2008.
The Brussels court has dismissed the claims entirely stating that the EC failed to prove that actual damage was suffered. Onno Brouwer, representing one of the manufacturers, says, “During the oral hearing, the EU could not answer the court’s question of, how many maintenance contracts it had concluded with the defendants. Similarly they also failed to confirm how many of the maintenance contracts, for which it was claiming damages, had been assessed by its external expert.
The court therefore ruled that the Commission failed to demonstrate the allegedly suffered damage.” Brouwer went on to say that the decision shows that Belgian Courts only allow antitrust damage claims with proper substantiation.
Full Content: Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI