Glass manufacturer Pilkington lost its challenge to a fine issued in 2008 by the European Commission for price-fixing, reports say.
The EU General Court decided Wednesday that Pilkington’s fines should not be reduced after the company, a unit of Japan-based Nippon Sheet Glass, argued that the Commission incorrectly applied competition law to calculate the sanctions.
Pilkington, Saint-Gobain and two other firms were fined a combined $1.68 billion for price-fixing; Pilkington alone was ordered to pay $445 million. UK-based Pilkington had appealed the fine and asked the General Court, the EU’s second-highest court, to reduce the penalty.
But in is ruling, the General Court found “the fine appears proportionate and adequate.”
Full content: Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI