The EU General Court has dealt a blow to the European Commission as it has partially reversed the Commission’s 2008 ruling against rights collecting societies. The Commission originally found the societies to have acted ant competitively, a decision the General Court now says does not have sufficient evidence. The case, CISAC vs Commission and Others, was based on complaints issued to the Commission filed in 2000 and 2003 alleging that CISAC, an umbrella company representing several collecting societies, acted ant competitively concerning its non-binding model contract, which was first established in 1936. According to reports, the contract was found to have been anticompetitive as it limited the ability to grant licenses in the territory of another collecting society party. The Commission subsequently ordered the societies to end the policy. The General Court has ruled, however, that there was not sufficient evidence for the Commission’s decision and partially annulled the ruling.
Featured News
NBA Teams Up With US Regulator on Prediction Markets
Oct 27, 2026 by
CPI
Intesa Wins ECB Approval for $36 Billion Monte dei Paschi Takeover
Oct 27, 2026 by
CPI
PayPal, Revolut Weigh In as UK Targets Apple’s Tap-to-Pay Rules
Oct 27, 2026 by
CPI
Heineken Ordered to Pay $124 Million in Greek Antitrust Case
Oct 27, 2026 by
CPI
FTC Raises Antitrust Concerns Over Cintas’ $5.5 Billion Deal
Oct 27, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Exclusive Dealing
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Exclusive Dealing Without Exclusivity: Screening Contracts, Loyalty Rebates, and the Limits of Antitrust Tests
Oct 25, 2026 by
David Martimort & Jérôme Pouyet
When Competition for Exclusivity Raises Prices: Rebates, Pricing Rules, and the Insulin Puzzle
Oct 25, 2026 by
Daniel P. O’Brien & Greg Shaffer
Why Leaving the Door Open Can Be (Much) Worse Than Closing It: Share-Based Requirements, Buyer-Specific Costs, and Foreclosure
Oct 25, 2026 by
Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI