France’s competition watchdog imposed a hefty fine of 250 million euros ($271.73 million) on Alphabet’s Google for violations linked to EU intellectual property rules concerning its association with media publishers. The watchdog’s decision, announced on Wednesday, cited concerns over Google’s AI service.
According to reports from Reuters, the watchdog highlighted Google’s AI-powered chatbot Bard, now rebranded as Gemini, as a focal point of contention. The chatbot allegedly utilized content from publishers and news agencies for training purposes without prior notification.
Despite Google’s decision not to contest the facts, settling proceedings, the company proposed remedial actions to address identified shortcomings. However, Google’s office in France remained silent in response to requests for comments on the matter.
This fine stems from a copyright dispute originating in France concerning online content. The conflict initially surfaced following complaints from major French news organizations, including Agence France Presse (AFP). Reuters previously reported that in 2022, Google had withdrawn its appeal against an initial 500 million euro fine issued after a comprehensive investigation by the Autorite de la Concurrence.
Read more: French Court Upholds Google Ad Fine
Nevertheless, Wednesday’s statement from the watchdog revealed that Google had failed to uphold four out of seven commitments outlined in the settlement. These breaches included purportedly not engaging in negotiations with publishers in good faith and lacking transparency in providing information.
The watchdog particularly highlighted Google’s AI chatbot Bard, launched in 2023, as a key point of concern. Allegedly, the chatbot was trained on data from various media outlets and news agencies without adequate notification to either the content providers or the regulatory authority.
Commenting on the matter, the watchdog emphasized that Google’s actions hindered the ability of publishers and press agencies to negotiate fair compensation, as the company linked the use of content by its AI service to the display of protected content.
This latest fine underscores the ongoing tensions between tech giants and media publishers regarding intellectual property rights and fair compensation.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh