
By: Kevin Coates (Covington Competition)
The European Commission published its draft guidelines on exclusionary abusive conduct by dominant firms under Article 102 TFEU (the “Draft Guidelines”) on 1 August 2024. These guidelines represent a significant departure from the 2009 Enforcement Priorities Guidance on Article 82 [now Article 102] (the “Priorities Guidance”). Whereas the Priorities Guidance focused heavily on economic concepts, the Draft Guidelines now emphasize the Commission’s interpretation of European Court rulings.
The consultation on the Draft Guidelines is open until 31 October 2024. Practical suggestions grounded in, and building upon, established case law are likely to have a stronger influence on the Commission’s final guidelines than purely economic arguments.
Similar to the Priorities Guidance, the Draft Guidelines concentrate on exclusionary conduct—behavior that benefits dominant firms by driving competitors out of the market—while largely excluding exploitative conduct, such as excessive pricing or unfair trading conditions, where a firm leverages its market power. However, in contrast to the Priorities Guidance, the Draft Guidelines acknowledge overlaps between exclusionary and exploitative behavior. They state that “principles relevant to the assessment of dominance (section 2) and the justifications based on objective necessity and efficiencies (section 5) are also relevant for the assessment of other forms of abusive conduct, such as exploitative abuses” (paragraph 11) and that “the same conduct by a dominant undertaking may have both exclusionary and exploitative effects” (footnote 17).
Additionally, the Draft Guidelines expand their scope to include collective dominance, rather than focusing solely on single-firm dominance.
These Draft Guidelines are significant not only for signaling how the Commission intends to enforce Article 102 against dominant companies—an approach already reflected in practice—but also for revealing how the Commission interprets the evolving case law from European Courts since the Priorities Guidance, and how it seeks to shape its future development. Since the Priorities Guidance was introduced in 2009, its principles have seen mixed outcomes in court decisions.
Featured News
Spain’s Economy Ministry to Scrutinize BBVA’s Attempted Sabadell Takeover
May 27, 2025 by
CPI
Bipartisan Group of State AGs Press Congress to Nix 10-Year Moratorium on AI Laws
May 27, 2025 by
CPI
ACCC Launches Preliminary Inquiry Into REA Group Over Alleged Price Gouging
May 27, 2025 by
CPI
Swiss Firm Clariant Hit with €1 Billion Lawsuit Over Alleged Price Fixing
May 27, 2025 by
CPI
European Commission Investigates Adult Sites Over DSA Non-Compliance
May 27, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros