Amazon’s US$8.5 billion deal to buy MGM might not be decided for several months with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Reuters writes.
The FTC stated as of last Friday, July 9, that it would be going ahead with a second request in its review of the merger. This, according to the report, indicates that the agency is likely to take months to come to a ruling.
The FTC is looking into Amazon as part of a number of probes into various Big Tech-related issues.
Amazon announced its intent in May to buy the legendary movie studio, which has been home to films such as the James Bond franchise. The deal would propel Amazon’s library of content to new heights and will allow it to continue competing with fellow giants Netflix, Disney+, and others.
In June, Amazon requested that Lina Khan, the FTC chair, be recused from the hearing, as she’d done research and had previous advocacy records.
PYMNTS has written about Amazon’s intent to buy MGM, reporting that it’s the newest in a series of moves to bolster the non-core part of the business: content for Amazon Prime.
“MGM has nearly a century of filmmaking history and complements the work of Amazon Studios, which has primarily focused on producing TV show programming,” a joint statement said, according to PYMNTS.
MGM’s acquisition, the latest in a string of tie-ups for the company, marks the passing of the company from a silent film-era giant into the streaming age currently dominating things.
Amazon had announced its intent to help archive and preserve the MGM film library, which contains over 4,000 films and 17,000 TV shows. And it’ll also work on making them available for viewing in modern ways. Mike Hopkins, senior VP of Prime Video and Amazon Studios, said “the treasure trove of IP that we plan to reimagine and develop together with MGM’s talented team” will be the most important thing gained in the transaction.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC and State Attorneys General Sue John Deere Over Repair Restrictions in Antitrust Case
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Enbridge Wins Legal Battle Against Ducere’s Antitrust Allegations
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
GOP Pushes for Antitrust Authority Consolidation Under DOJ in New Legislation
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Canadian Government Approves Bunge-Viterra Merger with Conditions
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
SEC Sues Elon Musk Over Delayed Disclosure of Twitter Stock Ownership
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand