A PYMNTS Company

FTC testifies on hold up by standard essential patent holders

By  |  July 12, 2012

Commissioner Edith Ramirez of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission has delivered testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on competition concerns with standard essential patent holders. Patent holders can work within standard setting organizations to ensure standardized technology across devices and systems. Although this has obvious procompetitive benefits, the FTC said that this practice could allow standard essential patent owners to “negotiate high royalty rates and other favorable terms after a standard is adopted that they could not have credibly demanded beforehand.”

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    To get around such hold up, the patent holder can make a RAND (reasonable and non-discriminatory) commitment to license its patent in exchange for a royalty. Yet problems persist, as the patent holder may be using its RAND commitment to seek an exclusion order for infringement, blocking the sale or import of the infringing products from the U.S. market. The patent holder could also “demand higher royalties or other more costly licensing terms.”

    In its testimony, the FTC stated that federal district courts and the International Trade Commission, under its public interest authority, will be able to limit hold up.

    Full content: FTC Press Release

     

    Related content: Reasons to Reject a “No Injunctions” Rule for SEPs and FRAND-Obligated Patents

     

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.