Ryanair intends to appeal a ruling by the European Commission yesterday that the carrier must pay back about €2m in state aid subsidies it received from an airport in Austria.
The Commission found that Ryanair and Tuifly secured an “undue advantage” as a result of certain airport services and marketing agreements concluded between them and the operator of Klagenfurt in southern Austria. The airport is owned by Austria’s State of Carinthia and the City of Klagenfurt.
Ryanair stopped using the airport in 2013. Between 2000 and 2015, the tiny airport handled anywhere between 200,000 and 500,000 passengers a year.
“Airport services and marketing agreements concluded with Ryanair, Tuifly and HLX (a carrier merged with Hapagfly in 2007 to form Tuifly) could not, when they were concluded, have been expected to generate more revenues than additional costs,” said the European Commission.
It added: “As no profit-driven airport manager would have concluded such loss-making agreements, they amount to state aid to the airlines. Moreover, the agreements simply reduce the operating costs of the airlines, without contributing to common transport objectives.”
The Commission said that the agreements distort competition and breach state aid rules. Ryanair benefited to the tune of €2m in aid, while Tuifly’s benefit was calculated at €1.1m, and HLX’s at €9.6m.
“In order to reduce the distortion of competition created by the illegal subsidies, Ryanair, Tuifly and HLX now have to pay these amounts back to Austria,” added the Commission.
A number of airports have been targeted in the past for providing what the Commission said was illegal state aid to Ryanair and other carriers such as EasyJet. “We note the Klagenfurt decision, where we stopped flying in 2013.
Full Content: Business News
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Spanish Antitrust Chief Says BBVA-Sabadell Merger Won’t Stifle Competition
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
German Road Repair Firms Fined for Collusion and Bid Rigging
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Visa and Mastercard Beat Cardholders’ Renewed Antitrust Claims Over Swipe Fees
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
US Firefighters’ Union Urges Antitrust Probe Into Fire Truck Industry
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Senators Urge FCC to Modernize Broadcast Ownership Rules Amid Digital Disruption
May 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece