Teva Pharmaceutical will pay $1.2 billion to settle US antitrust charges in a long-running “pay for delay” case involving Cephalon, which Teva acquired in 2012, the Federal Trade Commission said Thursday.
Israel-based Teva, the world’s largest generic drug manufacturer, agreed to make the money available to compensate buyers, including drug wholesalers, pharmacies and insurers, who overpaid for Cephalon’s blockbuster sleep-disorder drug Provigil because of that company’s illegal conduct.
Under the settlement, Teva also agreed to a prohibition in all of its US operations on the type of anticompetitive patent settlements that Cephalon used to artificially inflate the price of Provigil, according to the FTC.
The settlement stems from a 2008 FTC lawsuit against Cephalon alleging that the company unlawfully protected its monopoly on prescription drug Provigil from competition through so called “reverse-payment” deals with four generic drugmakers in 2005-2006.
Cephalon allegedly sued the drugmakers for infringing its Provigil patent and later paid them more than $300 million combined to drop their patent challenges and pledge to withhold marketing their generic versions for six years, until April 2012.
The Teva settlement is the first FTC case resolved after the US Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that reverse-payment patent settlements are subject to US antitrust rules, the commission noted.
“Today’s landmark settlement is an important step in the FTC’s ongoing effort to protect consumers from anticompetitive pay for delay settlements, which burden patients, American businesses, and taxpayers with billions of dollars in higher prescription drug costs,” FTC chair Edith Ramirez said in a statement.
Full content: The New York Times
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Nvidia and Microsoft Sued for Allegedly Undercutting AI Technology Patent Prices
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
White & Case Strengthens Antitrust and M&A Practices with New Partner Additions
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawyers’ Fee Demand Over JetBlue-Spirit Deal
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Boston Landlords Named as US Sues RealPage Over Alleged Rent-Inflating Practices
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Judge to Weigh Landmark NCAA Settlement Proposal in Antitrust Lawsuit
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI