Judge refuses to dismiss collusion claims against Citigroup and Discover for mandatory arbitration clause
U.S. District Judge William Pauley refused to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims of collusion by Citigroup and Discover over arbitration clauses. The lawsuit alleges that credit card holders were forced to agree to mandatory arbitration clauses, and if consumers refused, Citigroup and Discover did not issue them cards. Judge Pauley noted the defendants’ adoption of an arbitration clause that was similar to competitors’, as well as their attendance at meetings to discuss arbitration between 1999 and 2003.
Other card issuer defendants, including Bank of America, Capital One, and JP Morgan Chase, have since settled.
Source: Reuters
Related content: Anticompetitive Regulation in the Payment Card Industry (Ronald Mann, Columbia Law School)
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI