Judge refuses to dismiss collusion claims against Citigroup and Discover for mandatory arbitration clause
U.S. District Judge William Pauley refused to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims of collusion by Citigroup and Discover over arbitration clauses. The lawsuit alleges that credit card holders were forced to agree to mandatory arbitration clauses, and if consumers refused, Citigroup and Discover did not issue them cards. Judge Pauley noted the defendants’ adoption of an arbitration clause that was similar to competitors’, as well as their attendance at meetings to discuss arbitration between 1999 and 2003.
Other card issuer defendants, including Bank of America, Capital One, and JP Morgan Chase, have since settled.
Source: Reuters
Related content: Anticompetitive Regulation in the Payment Card Industry (Ronald Mann, Columbia Law School)
Featured News
EU Tech Firms Advocate for Sovereign Infrastructure Fund to Boost Tech Independence
Mar 17, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Administration Seeks to Extend Deadlines in U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel Lawsuit
Mar 17, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Antitrust Chief to Review Costly Consultants Amid Spending Cuts
Mar 17, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Antitrust Chief Gail Slater Assembles Veteran Team for Key Cases
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
UK Demands Access to Apple’s Encrypted Cloud Data, Spark Legal and Privacy Battle
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li