The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has reversed a district judge’s decision that threw out an antitrust lawsuit against Duke Energy Corp. The lawsuit accuses Cinergy–which was bought by Duke in 2006–of paying kickbacks to Cincinnati-area companies to win their support for an electricty rate increase in 2004.
The district judge had ruled that it did not have jurisdiction over the state-law claims; instead, jurisdiction rested exclusively with the Public Utilities Commission, which had approved Duke’s rates.
The three-judge panel unanimously reinstated the lawsuit, which is brought on behalf of Ohio businesses and consumers who saw their electricity bills go up after the rate hike.
Full content: Associated Press via Businessweek
Related content: Industry Restructuring, Mergers, and Efficiency: Evidence from Electric Power
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Dollar Tree to Sell Family Dollar for $1 Billion, Ending Struggling Merger
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
Meta Platforms Defends Use of Authors’ Works in AI Training in US Court
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
EU Pressed Meta to Address Antitrust Concerns Over Facebook Marketplace
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
UBS, Nomura, and UniCredit Fail to Overturn EU Antitrust Fines in Bond Trading Cartel Case
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
Coca-Cola Among Firms Targeted in EU Antitrust Raids
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mobile Ecosystems
Mar 24, 2025 by
CPI
Mobile Ecosystems: An Intellectual Entelechy but A Necessary Model
Mar 24, 2025 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
Creating Contestability and Fairness in Mobile Ecosystems: The Contribution of the DMA
Mar 24, 2025 by
Damien Geradin & Daniel Mandrescu
Digital Ecosystems and the Not (Yet) As Efficient Competitor Principle
Mar 24, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Assessing the Competition Law Scrutiny of Smart Wearables and Mobile AR/VR Devices
Mar 24, 2025 by
Kayvan Hazemi-Jebelli