The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has reversed a district judge’s decision that threw out an antitrust lawsuit against Duke Energy Corp. The lawsuit accuses Cinergy–which was bought by Duke in 2006–of paying kickbacks to Cincinnati-area companies to win their support for an electricty rate increase in 2004.
The district judge had ruled that it did not have jurisdiction over the state-law claims; instead, jurisdiction rested exclusively with the Public Utilities Commission, which had approved Duke’s rates.
The three-judge panel unanimously reinstated the lawsuit, which is brought on behalf of Ohio businesses and consumers who saw their electricity bills go up after the rate hike.
Full content: Associated Press via Businessweek
Related content: Industry Restructuring, Mergers, and Efficiency: Evidence from Electric Power
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI