Mexican Lawmakers Advance Controversial Plan to Dissolve Independent Oversight Bodies

In a significant legislative development, Mexico’s lower house of Congress has approved a constitutional proposal aimed at dismantling seven autonomous regulatory agencies. The measure, described by supporters as a step toward streamlining governance, has sparked widespread debate over its potential implications for institutional independence and economic agreements.
On Wednesday night, lawmakers voted 347-128 in favor of the proposal’s general text, with individual articles securing approval the following day. The bill will now proceed to the Senate, where the ruling coalition is just one vote shy of the two-thirds majority required for constitutional amendments.
The proposed legislation targets seven oversight bodies: the transparency institute (INAI), the antitrust regulator (Cofece), the telecommunications watchdog (IFT), the energy regulator (CRE), the hydrocarbon regulator (CNH), the commission for educational oversight (Mejoredu), and the council for evaluating social policies (Coneval). According to a statement from President Claudia Sheinbaum, the move will result in budgetary savings, as their functions will be absorbed by various government ministries.
Read more: Mexican Watchdog Proposes Fintech Reforms to Boost Financial Inclusion
Critics, however, warn that the plan could compromise the independence of these organizations, with some expressing concerns about potential repercussions for international agreements such as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). The trade pact is scheduled for review in 2026, and opponents argue that the changes could undermine key provisions related to fair competition and transparency.
To address these concerns, Ricardo Monreal, leader of the ruling Morena party in the lower house, introduced a proposal during the debates. Per a statement from lawmakers, this amendment would establish decentralized agencies to ensure the antitrust regulator and telecommunications watchdog retain technical autonomy and independent resources, even as some of their roles are integrated into government offices.
This adjustment, described by Monreal as a safeguard for maintaining competition oversight, was seen as a concession to critics. According to Reforma, the new agencies would be tasked with preventing and addressing monopolistic practices and ensuring barriers to competition are removed.
Source: MSN
Featured News
Meta Begins Defense After FTC Concludes Case in Landmark Antitrust Trial
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
UK Data Bill Still No Closer to Passage As Parliamentary ‘Ping-Pong’ Drags On
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Awarded $271.2M in Damages Against Amgen
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Chair Proposes 15% Staff Reduction Amid Budget Constraints
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
UK Urges Antitrust Watchdog to Prioritize Growth and Clarity in Business Regulation
May 15, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas