A US district judge dealt a major blow to Google-owned mobile phone maker Motorola Mobility, ruling against the company and its efforts to sue rivals for an alleged price-fixing conspiracy.
Motorola filed a lawsuit against Japan’s Sharp Corp., South Korea’s Samsung and other makers of LCD screens arguing the companies hiked product prices that were eventually sold in Motorola devices.
Those devices, however, we bought both in and outside the US. That fact lead US District Judge Joan B. Gottschall to dismiss the majority of the case under grounds that “the transactions were overwhelmingly foreign in nature” and therefore not covered by US antitrust law.
US antitrust authorities pursued a record-breaking case against various makers of LCD screens in recent years, leading to more than $1 billion in fines to manufacturers including Samsung, Sharp, Hitachi, LG, AU Optronics and Toshiba.
Full Content: Bloomberg
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Extends Decision Deadline for Ita-Lufthansa Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
UK, US and Australia Sanction Senior Leader of LockBit Cybercrime Gang
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI