A US district judge dealt a major blow to Google-owned mobile phone maker Motorola Mobility, ruling against the company and its efforts to sue rivals for an alleged price-fixing conspiracy.
Motorola filed a lawsuit against Japan’s Sharp Corp., South Korea’s Samsung and other makers of LCD screens arguing the companies hiked product prices that were eventually sold in Motorola devices.
Those devices, however, we bought both in and outside the US. That fact lead US District Judge Joan B. Gottschall to dismiss the majority of the case under grounds that “the transactions were overwhelmingly foreign in nature” and therefore not covered by US antitrust law.
US antitrust authorities pursued a record-breaking case against various makers of LCD screens in recent years, leading to more than $1 billion in fines to manufacturers including Samsung, Sharp, Hitachi, LG, AU Optronics and Toshiba.
Full Content: Bloomberg
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Spain’s BBVA Remains Optimistic About Hostile Takeover of Sabadell
Mar 18, 2025 by
CPI
BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street Seek Dismissal of Texas Antitrust Lawsuit
Mar 18, 2025 by
CPI
EU to Boost Metal Sectors with Energy Relief and Safeguards
Mar 18, 2025 by
CPI
Players’ Association Sues Tennis Governing Bodies Over Alleged Antitrust Violations
Mar 18, 2025 by
CPI
Turkey Moves to Curb Big Tech’s Power with New Regulatory Bill
Mar 18, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li