By Gary Winslett, Middlebury College
Spurred on by populists in both parties, Congress is considering a range of bills that would radically remake American antitrust policy in the name of reining in Big Tech. Passing these bills would be a serious mistake. They would do great harm and very little good. While there are reasonable criticisms of the Big Tech firms to be made, a close examination of the facts and evidence related to antitrust show that the case for this big revision of competition policy is actually quite weak. In this paper, I begin by explaining the interacting visions of competition that underlie American antitrust policy. I then examine each of the main antitrust-oriented charges that today’s populists make against the Big Tech companies and show why those charges are not as persuasive as they may at first seem. I end the paper by arguing that a sector-based understanding of antitrust can lead to a more effective competition policy posture than that advocated by populists.
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh