Recent Regulatory Developments in Training Artificial Intelligence Models Under the GDPR
By: Marcus Evans & Rosie Nance (Norton Rose Fulbright)
In 2024, many organizations are increasingly exploring how to leverage their data to launch or enhance AI programs. A common approach is to use this data to train AI models or refine third-party models. Often, this involves processing personal data, requiring compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the EU or UK.
X, formerly known as Twitter, recently attempted to train its AI chatbot, Grok, using data from user posts. However, following discussions with Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC), the company agreed to suspend this data processing. This article examines the key events and offers considerations for data controllers when using personal data to train AI models.
On May 7, 2024, X introduced a new setting under ‘Settings and Privacy’ regarding Grok’s training. This setting, enabled by default, allowed users to opt out. Users were asked if they would “Allow your posts as well as your interactions, inputs, and results with Grok to be used for training and fine-tuning.”
Details on how to opt out are available on X’s website, which also notes that setting an account to private will prevent the use of posts for training Grok (only public posts are used).
In its privacy notice, X states: “We may use the information we collect and publicly available information to help train our machine learning or artificial intelligence models for the purposes outlined in this policy.” The company appears to rely on legitimate interests (Article 6(1)(f) of the GDPR) to process data for model training and provides further details on its legitimate interests assessment on its website.
The Irish DPC applied to the Irish High Court to compel X to suspend data processing for this purpose. The case was heard on August 8, 2024. X’s Global Government Affairs department has noted that the DPC’s order would affect all AI models at X, not just Grok…
Featured News
FTC Takes On Prescription Drug Middlemen Over High Insulin Costs
Sep 20, 2024 by
CPI
EU’s Incoming Competition Head Pushes for Policy Shift to Support ‘European Champions
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Challenges $217 Million Legal Fee Demand in Privacy Case
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
EU Moves to Enforce Apple’s Compliance with New Market Rules
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
California Attorney General Bonta Stands Firm Against Albertsons-Kroger Merger
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
Francisco Javier Núñez Melgoza
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
Julio Garcia
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
Alejandra Palacios Prieto
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
Mateo Fernández