Resh(AI)ping Good Administration: Addressing the Mass Effects of Public Sector Digitalisation
By: Albert Sánchez-Graells (How to Crack a Nut)
Prof. Albert Sanchez-Graells presents his latest paper, where he explores the transformative impact of public sector digitalisation on governance. The rapid pace of digitalisation has outstripped the development of legal frameworks, leading to a lag in adapting good administration guarantees to the evolving landscape. Despite international efforts to align administrative practices with digital governance, progress has been slow. The rise of automated decision-making processes poses a significant challenge to traditional guarantees of good administration, potentially compromising individual due process rights and eroding public trust. While existing analyses often focus on reconciling established duties with the challenges of digitalisation, Sanchez-Graells takes a critical and technology-centric doctrinal approach.
The paper delves into the European context, emphasizing the increasing scholarly attention given to automated decision-making. However, it argues that the current discussions fall short in addressing the collective impact of digitalisation. Sanchez-Graells contends that there is a pressing need to go beyond individual-focused debates and adapt good administration guarantees to a collective dimension. To address the challenges posed by automated decision-making, he proposes an extension and broadening of the public sector’s good administration duties.
The suggested modifications involve implementing an extended ex ante control of organizational risk-taking and a broader ex post duty of automated redress. By emphasizing the potential mass effects of automated decision-making by the public sector, the paper advocates for urgent legal reforms to ensure that good administration guarantees remain relevant and effective in the era of digital transformation…
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh