Charles Schwab lost its bid to end antitrust litigation seeking to unwind its $26 billion acquisition of TD Ameritrade over claims that the transaction slashed rebates and discounts for retail investors.
Judge Amos L. Mazzant let the case move forward, saying it’s plausible the merger worsened consolidation within an already tight-knit financial sector, curtailing competition among brokers that kept trading costs in check through widespread “price improvement” for ordinary traders.
Related: New US Suit Looks To Undo Schwab-Ameritrade Deal
“Allegations of this nature, which indicate that a transaction has resulted in increased market concentration, are sufficient,” he wrote. “Whether divestiture or another form of injunctive relief is appropriate in this case will ultimately turn on a balancing of the equitable principles.”
The company’s defenses rely on fact-intensive arguments that can’t be resolved until later in the case, the judge said.
A spokesperson for Schwab, in a statement to Bloomberg Law, said Monday that the company “will continue to aggressively seek the dismissal of this meritless case.”
“Allegations are not facts,” the firm said. “We look forward to demonstrating the value and appropriateness of our approach in court. Any suggestion that the combination of these two client-centric firms has led to less favorable outcomes is simply not true.”
The dispute concerns changes to the retail brokerage industry in recent years as fintech firms developing complex algorithms—acting as market makers—drive a shift from a commission-based business model to one dependent on sales of trading data from downstream brokerages like Schwab.
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh