The Financial Times reports that the U.K. Serious Fraud Office (“SFO”) had declined to open a criminal investigation into Libor manipulation because of limited resources. Richard Alderman, the former director of the SFO, decided last year that the agency’s budget was too limited and that the Office of Fair Trading and the Financial Services Authority would be in a better position to handle the probe. However, the Financial Services Authority, which recently settled civil charges with Barclays, cannot prosecute bankers because its purview does not include derivatives fraud.
Featured News
Tensions Rise as Microsoft Considers Ending OpenAI Negotiations
Jun 18, 2025 by
CPI
Senate Passes GENIUS Act To Allow Trading In Dollar-Pegged Stablecoins
Jun 18, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Urges NASCAR and 23XI Racing to Settle Charter Dispute
Jun 18, 2025 by
CPI
Indonesia Grants Conditional Approval to TikTok’s Tokopedia Acquisition
Jun 18, 2025 by
CPI
Nevada Governor Blocks Price-Fixing Ban Amid Debate Over Market Regulation
Jun 18, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Theories of Harm
Jun 17, 2025 by
CPI
What Do We Mean by Harm to the Competitive Process?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Sean Sullivan
Is There a Better Approach to Vertical Merger Analysis?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Bob Majure & Andrew Sfekas
California’s Ill-Advised Turn Toward Europeanized Theories of Harm For Single-Firm Conduct
Jun 17, 2025 by
Geoffrey Manne, Dirk Auer & Brian Albrecht
EU Competition Policy in Support of Democracy and Sustainability: What Theories of Harm When Moving Away From the Predominance of the Consumer Welfare Paradigm?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Marios C. Iacovides