South Africa: Supreme Court ruling in bread price-fixing case defines class action guidelines
The Bloemfontein Supreme Court of Appeal has given the go-ahead for a class action to proceed against various bread companies in an overturning of a previous ruling by the Western Cape High Court to refuse the class certificate. The class action has been brought against Pioneer Foods, Tiger Consumer Brands and Premier Foods; the Competition Tribunal found the companies guilty of price-fixing in 2007. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the prosecutors in a ruling that defines the guidelines and requirements for a class action. According to court documents, the class is basing its case on the premise of the right to food. The Supreme Court has extended the case to umbrella the right of access to court, arguing that without a class action, individuals would not be able to afford the legal fees necessary to charge the bread companies.
Featured News
Tech Policy and Regulation Weekly Roundup
Jan 23, 2026 by
CPI
Perkins Coie Adds Former DOJ Antitrust Leader as Partner in Washington
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
Ryanair Boss Dismisses Musk’s Buyout as Starlink Feud Escalates
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Extends Warner Bros Bid as Netflix Rivalry Heats Up
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Breaks New Ground With Landmark AI Law
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Recidivism
Jan 21, 2026 by
CPI
Recidivism, Multiple Offending, and Serial Offending in Antitrust
Jan 21, 2026 by
Gregory Werden
Antitrust Recidivism: Why Repeat Cases Appear, and Why True Reoffending Is Rare in the United States
Jan 21, 2026 by
Lisa M. Phelan, Megan S. Golden, Adrienne Irmer & Nina Worth
99 Antitrust Problems – Is Recidivism One?
Jan 21, 2026 by
Brian A. Ratner & Kartik S. Madiraju
Holding A Cat by the Tail: A View of Cartel Recidivism in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 21, 2026 by
Mark Rosman & KaDee L. Ru