In the midst of recent suits charging Barclays with LIBOR manipulation, the U.S. is now threatening to fine the bank for about $470 million, alleging Barclays manipulate electricity markets in California. The fine would exceed the money paid by Barclays in the LIBOR scandal. According to the penalty, which would be issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the bank has 30 days to argue against the claims of price-fixing in the electricity sector in a “loss-leader” scheme, where electricity prices were fixed to show a loss so as to make profits in related position in the swaps market. If a suit is filed, the case could set a precedent, determining whether the practice is legal or not. The FERC earned the power to fight price-manipulation in 2005.
Featured News
Toast Faces FTC Lawsuit Over Alleged Hidden Fees and Subscription Practices
Oct 29, 2026 by
CPI
Amazon, Uber and Instacart Challenge NYC Delivery Worker Protections in Federal Court
Oct 29, 2026 by
CPI
Wall Street Law Giant Weil Gotshal to Dissolve After Partner Exodus
Oct 29, 2026 by
CPI
DoorDash to Acquire Instacart in $17 Billion Grocery Delivery Deal
Oct 29, 2026 by
CPI
Anthropic Urges California to Give Courts Power to Block High-Risk AI Models
Oct 29, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Exclusive Dealing
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Exclusive Dealing Without Exclusivity: Screening Contracts, Loyalty Rebates, and the Limits of Antitrust Tests
Oct 25, 2026 by
David Martimort & Jérôme Pouyet
When Competition for Exclusivity Raises Prices: Rebates, Pricing Rules, and the Insulin Puzzle
Oct 25, 2026 by
Daniel P. O’Brien & Greg Shaffer
Why Leaving the Door Open Can Be (Much) Worse Than Closing It: Share-Based Requirements, Buyer-Specific Costs, and Foreclosure
Oct 25, 2026 by
Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI