A Pennsylvania federal judge on Tuesday refused to hold Comcast Corp. to an outline of a settlement the company and plaintiffs in an antitrust dispute had tentatively reached prior to the U.S. Supreme Court agreeing to review a class certification issue in the monopolization case. In an order signed Tuesday, U.S. District Judge John R. Padova concluded there was no enforceable settlement contract between Comcast and a group of Philadelphia-area cable subscribers claiming the company illegally used its monopoly power to increase prices.
Featured News
Federal Court Narrows Turkey Price-Fixing Lawsuit, Clears Perdue and Foster Farms
Jul 9, 2026 by
CPI
Italy Penalizes Character.AI Owner Over Child Safety and Privacy Controls
Jul 9, 2026 by
CPI
State AGs Prepare Antitrust Complaint Against Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery
Jul 9, 2026 by
CPI
Latham & Watkins Expands Brussels Antitrust Practice
Jul 9, 2026 by
CPI
EU Makes SAP Antitrust Commitments Binding in ERP Support Case
Jul 9, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Due Process
Jul 7, 2026 by
CPI
The Hart‑Scott‑Rodino Act at Fifty: Procedure, Thresholds, Serial Acquisitions, and Industry Dynamics
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ginger Zhe Jin, Mario Leccese, Daniel Sokol, Liad Wagman & Mengyi Zhong
Due Process In Competition Cases: Reflections As Of 2026
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ian Forrester & Pablo Trevisan
When Referees Become Reformers: Due Process and Constitutional Considerations in Competition Market Investigations
Jul 7, 2026 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Procedural Fairness in Antitrust Enforcement: A Comparative Analysis
Jul 7, 2026 by
J. Mark Gidley & Daniel Sokol