Judge Robert H. Bork has passed away early Wednesday. He was 85. Bork is known as a conservative icon, leading an often controversial lifelong fight against “liberal judicial activism,” arguing judges with a liberal bias let personal views conflict with their Constitutional interpretations. Bork’s first book, The Antitrust Paradox, was published in 1978 and is considered a classic work by many in the antitrust community; Bork controversially argued in his text that the nation’s original intent of competition law was solely for the protection of consumers and competition, not the protection of competitors. Therefore, he argued, some practices – such as vertical agreements – do not harm consumers and therefore should not be outlawed. From its first publication to the early 2000s, the Supreme Court adopted some views stated in the book; the publication lead to several changes to antitrust law, legalizing some practices that were previously illegal.
Featured News
As Congress Considers a Ban On State AI Regs, California and NY Forge Ahead
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Canada Watchdog Calls for Easing Foreign Investment Rules in Airline Sector
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Litigation Finance Battle Heats Up in Tyson Foods Price-Fixing Case
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Spain Weighs Additional Conditions on BBVA’s Hostile Bid for Sabadell
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Japan’s TDK Buys SoftEye to Strengthen Smart Glasses Capabilities
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Theories of Harm
Jun 17, 2025 by
CPI
What Do We Mean by Harm to the Competitive Process?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Sean Sullivan
Is There a Better Approach to Vertical Merger Analysis?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Bob Majure & Andrew Sfekas
California’s Ill-Advised Turn Toward Europeanized Theories of Harm For Single-Firm Conduct
Jun 17, 2025 by
Geoffrey Manne, Dirk Auer & Brian Albrecht
EU Competition Policy in Support of Democracy and Sustainability: What Theories of Harm When Moving Away From the Predominance of the Consumer Welfare Paradigm?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Marios C. Iacovides