In a move that few find surprising, the Big Four auditors within the United Kingdom – PwC, Earnst & Young, KPMG and Deloitte – have issued a harsh and scathing response to claims that the companies dominate the market and hamper competition, leading to less innovation and lower quality for consumers. Provisional findings of the market structure were first issued by the Competition Commission last February; specifically, the Commission criticized the market’s barriers that exist for customers who try to switch auditors. But now the Big Four are vocalizing their opposition to the findings, calling the report “flawed,” “unsound” and selective in its arguments. The companies are also contesting the Commission’s findings that the auditors prioritize management interests over those of companies’ shareholders.
Featured News
Jury in Boston Set to Decide Takeda’s Fate in Amitiza Antitrust Trial
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
OnlyFans Faces New Antitrust Lawsuit
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
Americans’ Opposition to Hosting AI Data Centers Hardens, Survey Finds
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
NextEra Energy Agrees to $9.5 Million Settlement in Nuclear Industry Wage-Fixing Case
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Agency Raids Petrochemical Firms in Price-Fixing Probe
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos