The Takeover Panel has delivered a rare public criticism of three firms involved in a deal relating to the mining company formerly known as Bumi, five years after its ill-fated debut on the London stock market.
The Panel singled out Credit Suisse, Freshfields and Holman Fenwick Willan for three main breaches of the Takeover Code. The conduct of the firms “was sufficiently serious to merit the issue by the Panel of a statement of public censure”, it said.
A fourth adviser, JP Morgan, failed to satisfy two terms of the code, in conduct the Panel described as “disappointing”, but escaped public censure.
A public criticism is the Takeover Panel’s highest level of censure. It is only the second time in five years the Panel has issued this type of statement.
Bumi was renamed Asia Resource Minerals in 2013 and left the stock market this year after losing more than 90pc of its value. Nat Rothschild, the financier who helped found the firm, once described the venture as “a terrible mistake”.
The acquisition in question dates back to 2011, when Mr Rothschild’s shell company Vallar bought interests in two Indonesian coal mines from Bakrie Group and Bukit Mutiara for $3bn. Vallar later became Bumi, and later still Asia Resource Minerals, in a protracted series of wrangles between Mr Rothschild and his Indonesian partners.
Full content: The Wall Street Journal
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
New UK Legislation to Combat Ticket Resale and Algorithmic Price-Fixing
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
Supreme Court Justices Grill TikTok’s Lawyer in National Security Case
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
FTC, DOJ Weigh Antitrust Issues in Musk’s OpenAI Case
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
UK Trial Begins as Apple Defends App Store Fees in £1.5 Billion Case
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
Italy to Retain Full Control of Data in Potential Deal with Musk’s Starlink
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand