Despite Ryanair’s attempts to appeal a review of the airline’s recent takeover of 30 percent of Aer Lingus’ stake, the UK Supreme Court has announced its denial to review the lower court’s decision that allowed the investigation to proceed. According to the UK’s highest court, set in London, the appeal did not have an “arguable point of law of general public importance,” and reinforced the European policy that initially blocked the deal, once the European Commission found it to be anti-competitive. The Commission found that the transaction risked increase fares for consumers and reduced consumers’ choice for flights departing from Ireland. The controversy concerning the two airliners has dragged on since 2006; its most recent bid to acquire Aer Lingus was denied last December.
Featured News
CFTC Moves To East Reporting Requirements for Prediction Markets
May 16, 2026 by
CPI
California’s Settlement With GM Signals Closer Scrutiny of Data Sales
May 16, 2026 by
CPI
Jury in Boston Set to Decide Takeda’s Fate in Amitiza Antitrust Trial
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
OnlyFans Faces New Antitrust Lawsuit
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
Americans’ Opposition to Hosting AI Data Centers Hardens, Survey Finds
May 14, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos