Apple Inc. released a letter Monday slamming the US Department of Justice’s proposed remedies against the tech giant following a judge’s ruling that Apple conspired to fix eBooks prices, blasting the suggestion that Apple needs its own watchdog to monitor business practices.
Following the ruling, US District Judge Denise Cote will now decide on sanctions to impose on the tech company. The DOJ recommended the requirement that Apple sever its ties with the publishers also accused of fixing eBooks prices – all of which settled with authorities outside of court – and be assigned its own watchdog to prevent such practices from occurring again.
The Court posted Apple’s letter Monday, which slammed the belief that the company needs an external monitor. According to Apple, such a watchdog “would give Amazon a significant competitive advantage over Apple – an advantage it is neither entitled to nor deserves.” Further, the company described the proposed remedies by the DOJ as “plainly improper.”
Apple plans to appeal Judge Cote’s decision, an appeal that would be heard next year. Until then, onlookers await the next court meeting of the parties to decide what Apple’s punishment will be.
Full Content: TIME
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
PepsiCo Sued Over Alleged Price Discrimination Involving Walmart
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
Regulators Approve Conditions for Multibillion-Dollar Oil Mergers
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Reaches Settlement with Private Equity Firm Over Antitrust Allegations in Texas
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Raises Antitrust Concerns Over Big Tech’s AI Partnerships
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
MultiPlan and Insurers Move to Dismiss Antitrust Allegations Amid Growing Legal Challenges
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand