Apple has slammed Judge Denise Cote and called for her to recuse herself from proceedings that could determine damages Apple will have to pay for its involvement in an eBooks price-fixing scheme, say reports.
Judge Cote is set to rule in a damages trial as states seek damages from the collusion after Judge Cote ruled against Apple in the Department of Justice’s lawsuit against the company. While the DOJ did not seek monetary damages, states and consumers have filed their own class actions against the company and are now seeking damages.
As Apple appeals Judge Cote’s decision that found Apple guilty of the collusion, the company is also working to prevent that same judge from deciding whether Apple should pay damages, or how much the damages will be, in these law suits.
In a filing made last month but made public last week, Apple said that previous statements by Judge Cote show that she “cannot serve as an impartial arbiter” in the damages trial.
Those impartial remarks, the iPhone maker said, were made in her January order that denied Apple’s request to have its external monitor temporarily removed from service.
The monitor was appointed by Judge Cote to oversee Apple’s antitrust compliance. When Apple requested to have that monitor removed from service, Judge Cote said that “consumers of eBooks – including Apple’s own consumers – suffered hundreds of millions of dollars in harm.”
That statement, Apple argues, means Judge Cote is in no place to determine without bias how much, if anything, Apple should pay in damages, and that the statement shows “that the Court has already decided what plaintiffs must ‘conclusively prove’” in their pursuit of a summary judgment of damages.
Full Content: Publishers Weekly
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
OpenAI Board Denies Receiving Formal Bid from Elon Musk
Feb 12, 2025 by
CPI
Thomas Kauper, Former DOJ Antitrust Leader, Dies at 89
Feb 12, 2025 by
CPI
BlackRock’s Acquisition of Preqin Secures UK Regulatory Approval
Feb 12, 2025 by
CPI
NFL Sued Over Bluesky Ban by Fans Citing Antitrust Violations
Feb 12, 2025 by
CPI
Warburg Pincus Strikes $1 Billion Deal to Acquire Vermont Information Processing
Feb 12, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – International Criminal Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
CPI
The Antitrust Division’s Recent Work to Combat International Cartels
Jan 23, 2025 by
Emma Burnham & Benjamin Christenson
Information Sharing: The New Frontier of U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
Brian P. Quinn, Casey Kovarik & Michael Tubach
The Key Role of Guidelines on Exchanges of Information Among Competitors and the Divergent Transatlantic Paths
Jan 23, 2025 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz & Albert Metz
Leniency, Whistleblowers, and Compliance
Jan 23, 2025 by
Richard Powers, Tara O’Malley & Cory Gordon