As a jury in California met once again to deliberate and calculate the damages Samsung owes its rival Apple for patent infringements, reports say Samsung has requested a stay in the trial, calling on the judge to declare a mistrial. It’s a move Apple is criticizing as one that “crossed the bounds of reason,” say reports.
Late Thursday, however, the jury announced its verdict: Samsung is to pay $290.5 million in damages to Apple for infringing on 13 Apple products; in total, the damages Samsung is ordered to pay its rival amount to $929.8 million in the lawsuit.
Samsung filed an emergency motion for US District Judge Lucy Koh to halt the trial hours after the US Patent Office rejected Apple’s response to the Office’s previous rejection of one of the patents in question.
”This decision calls into question the entire jury verdict in this trial,” Samsung said according to court documents.
Samsung and Apple are currently at war around the globe for smartphone domination, and are both expected to go to court once again next March in an even larger case involving patent infringement claims on newer devices.
A previous jury for the current case found Samsung liable to $1.05 billion in damages, but Judge Koh tossed the figure, saying it was miscalculated based on 13 patents. The damages for those 13 Samsung products found to have infringed on Apple patents will now be calculated by the new jury.
In total, the court found 26 Samsung products to have infringed on Apple patents.
Full Content: Bloomberg and PCWorld
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
US Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Denying Copyright for AI-Generated Art
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
Morrison Foerster Expands European Antitrust Practice
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
HSBC in Advanced Talks to Sell German Fund Unit to BlackFin Capital Partners
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
EU’s Antitrust War on Big Tech Heats Up as US Trade Disputes Grow
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Authorities Conduct Raids on Global Advertising Firms in Price-Fixing Probe
Mar 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li